BTA open letter to Camden gains over 100 local signatories

Dear Mr Olszewski,

Re: Redevelopment of the Bacton Low Rise Estate

Bacton Towers Action (BTA) is a group of residents campaigning for better housing in our area. We are writing to ask for a public meeting between Camden officials and residents to discuss Mount Anvil’s proposal for the redevelopment of the Bacton Low Rise Estate. Our mostly low-rise, working class neighbourhood is being turned into a high-rise investment opportunity for private buyers through the overdevelopment of three sites – Bacton, Wendling and West Kentish Town Estate. 

The cumulative impact of these developments on both existing residents as well as people and families desperately looking for affordable homes in the borough has not been acknowledged by Camden Council, whose representatives have not been able to explain how these developments benefit local people.  

In fact, Mount Anvil’s proposal for Bacton contravenes previous consultations, Camden’s own planning policy and the Gospel Oak and Haverstock Community Vision, which residents were involved in shaping as recently as 2022. The original scheme, for which Camden Council obtained planning permission in 2012, had the support of the local community. We want the new proposal to have similar levels of support and argue that it is possible to develop a scheme that is sensitive to the existing community while meeting the need for new housing. 

Camden officials have repeatedly told us to take our concerns directly to Mount Anvil, who have been running a poorly advertised and inaccessible consultation for over a year, which has resulted in minimal changes to the design of the scheme. Many residents who have engaged in this consultation in good faith have become frustrated by the lack of genuine listening on the part of the developer, who appears to be caught between its own commercial interest and the demands of Camden Council, resulting in the forced overdevelopment of the site, with three tall towers crudely squeezed into limited space. 

BTA has spoken with hundreds of people across the neighbourhood, and we have found that there is overwhelming disapproval of the Bacton towers. People want more social and affordable housing, and they understand this involves sacrifices and some disruption. But the huge private towers proposed for the Bacton site is not the answer because they will divide social and private tenants, drive up rents, put adjacent buildings into the shade, add further strain on already stretched services, cause massive disruption, pollution and CO2 emissions while providing no community facilities or affordable workspace for existing residents. 

These are legitimate concerns. However, Mount Anvil have stated this on their latest online consultation form:

“Some hostile groups/individuals are targeting consultations in an attempt to skew results towards less favourable outcomes which are not in the public interest. […] You need to “think for yourself” and should reflect carefully on how you have been informed on the facts of the consultation ahead of sharing your views.”

This is patronising language, suggesting that residents of Gospel Oak and Haverstock cannot think critically and that groups such as BTA are manipulating people. We suggest the opposite is true. 

Mount Anvil officials have been unable to answer simple questions such as how services for an additional 1,000 residents would be provided, and instead have presented their figures in ways that are deeply misleading. For example, to claim a higher ratio of social to private housing, Mount Anvil’s figures combine the percentage of social housing units across Bacton phase 1 (Cherry Court) and phase 2, even though Cherry Court was built several years ago by Camden Council and is now fully occupied. 

As a result, many residents have no confidence in the consultation run by Mount Anvil, who have a vested interest in this process. We have written to Camden officers and councillors on multiple occasions before with a request to meet with us directly and explain the benefits of these developments for all residents in the area. Local TRAs have done the same and were promised such a meeting by Cllr Boyland at the Gospel Oak DMC meeting in June, but nothing has happened since. In fact, Cllr Boyland has attempted to backtrack on this commitment. Camden’s refusal to engage with us is bewildering given the enormity of the proposed schemes, which represent a major change of planning in Camden.

However, we know that such dialogue is possible. We understand that Yoo Capital and Camden officers recently met with residents to discuss the proposal for the Camden Film Quarter on Regis Road. 

We therefore ask for a public meeting within the next month in which residents can speak directly with Camden officers involved in this development to ask questions, express our concerns and understand the benefits this scheme presents for our community in more detail.

We look forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

Robert Lewenstein

Chair, Bacton Towers Action

(21 October 2025)


Signatories:

  1. Donald Sumpter
  2. Antonia Brown
  3. Ed Audland
  4. Tom Young
  5. Jacqui Jeans
  6. Sean Titley
  7. Phil Thornton 
  8. Julia Oertli
  9. T Ewing
  10. Alice Bown
  11. Yasmin Allen
  12. W.F. Bromwich
  13. Cordelia Mayfield
  14. Heiba Lamara
  15. Sarah Allen
  16. Robert Lewenstein
  17. Jess Morrison
  18. Jack Morrison
  19. Siobhan Chomse 
  20. David Colman
  21. Lizzy Fleet
  22. Daniel Fleet
  23. Joe Fleet
  24. Lily Fleet
  25. Mary Kuligowski
  26. Richard Atkins
  27. Paul Birrell
  28. Joanna Neicho 
  29. Judith Silver
  30. Myra Farnworth
  31. Derek Farnworth
  32. Colin Campbell
  33. Mary Pat Campbell
  34. Pat Bullivant
  35. Robert Zagar
  36. Thea Thompson
  37. Sally Llewellyn 
  38. Stephen Webster
  39. Kitty Llewellyn 
  40. Cece Wilden
  41. David Irvine 
  42. Peter Baker
  43. Patricia Atkin
  44. Patricia Langton
  45. Lynn Melvin
  46. Una Sapietis
  47. Gill Hay
  48. Katy Dent
  49. Alex Abbey
  50. Andrew Boxer
  51. Jean Prentice
  52. Mick Farrant
  53. Dinah Gallop
  54. Gill Heuman
  55. Adam Heuman
  56. Rosemary Fitzgerald
  57. Suza Johnston
  58. Ruth Cigman
  59. Michael Cigman
  60. Charlotte Friedman
  61. Deborah Eastwood
  62. Julia Eccleshare
  63. Waltraud Loges
  64. Jason Best
  65. Pat Bullivant
  66. Keiran Proffer    
  67. Ed Reynolds
  68. Rod Allsion
  69. Anne Allison
  70. Daniel Solomons 
  71. Justine Solomons
  72. Rosemary Burrows
  73. Frances Barlow
  74. Nigel Wenban-Smith
  75. Karen Holden
  76. Daniel Simons
  77. Hannah Simons
  78. Rita Fernandez
  79. Matthew McNally
  80. Paula Messinger
  81. Michael Palin
  82. Lara Leon-Cullen
  83. Anke Jakob
  84. Henrik Roth
  85. Kala Jenkins 
  86. Angela De Pizzol
  87. Sally Kellner
  88. Maria Fernandez
  89. Jonathan fisher
  90. Mame Apenteng
  91. Adrian Mars
  92. J. Macadie Gay 
  93. N. Macadie Gay
  94. Patrick Haymann
  95. Shoda Rackal
  96. Luis Campos
  97. Emma Cullen
  98. Denise Connell
  99. Mel Tomkins
  100. Kirsty McDonagh
  101. Jo Siedlecka
  102. Julietta Cochrane
  103. Murray Thomson
  104. Susanne Kord
  105. John Landau
  106. Peter Herbert
  107. Deirdre Yager
  108. Candida Scotter
  109. Pauline Murray 
  110. M.Morrison-Birt
  111. T.Morrison-Birt
  112. Robert Holtom

If you would like to add your name to the open letter, please reach out to us at bactontowersaction@gmail.com.


Please note that since this letter was sent to Camden Council, Mount Anvil have edited their consultation form to remove this section, though evidence of their original wording is documented in the screenshot below.